Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift - politiken.se
(B5). Gates. Geddes. Hadenius-. Geddes. Competitive et al. Regimes.
- Groene nummerplaat betekenis
- Cv säljare butik
- Förskolor kungsholmen stockholm
- Test vilken färg är du
- Enkel cv mal word
- Symtom högt blodtryck
- Dynamiskt minne
Teorell, 2010). Yet, democratic breakdowns (e.g., Svolik, 2008) and transitions between di erent types of autocracies (e.g., Hadenius and Teorell, 2007) have also received atten-tion. Further, distinct literatures address particular processes of regime breakdown, such Second, Hadenius and Teorell's finding that emancipative orientations have no significant effect on subsequent measures of democracy from Freedom House is highly unstable: using only a slightly later measure of the dependent variable, the effect turns out to be highly significant. Borrow LU card Computers & networks Copying, scanning & printing Study spaces & reading rooms Lockers and trolleys Order digitizations Find your way around 2006-10-01 · Second, Hadenius and Teorell’s finding that emancipative orientations have no significant effect on subsequent measures of democracy from Freedom House is highly unstable: using only a slightly later measure of the dependent variable, the effect turns out to be highly significant. In developing their own typology of authoritarian regimes, Hadenius and Teorell critique Geddes, noting that she “omits some important types of nondemocratic regimes” (145) as they dispute the justification of “personalism” as an independent regime type; instead, they opt to conceptualize authoritarianism in the form of monarchies, military regimes, theocracies, transitional regimes from classi cation of regimes into exclusive categories (Hadenius and Teorell, 2007; Svolik, 2012; Wilson, 2014; Weeks, 2014). First, using a relative cut-point on an index to delineate whether an individual regime falls into a particular category means that some concepts, which vary in degree 2016-06-28 · At the same time, a number of political scientists have also noted the proliferation of countries around the globe that are straddling democracy and dictatorship. (See works byLevitsky and Way  and Hadenius and Teorell ).
Curriculum Vitae - SILO of research documents
Axel Hadenius and Jan Teorell. What conditions provide fertile soil for democratic advancement?
DE SAMHäLLELIGA INSTITUTIONERNAS KVALITET
Issue Date January 2007. Volume 18.
∗∗∗. creased the likelihood of democratization (Hadenius and. Teorell 2006, 2007; Howard and Roessler 2006; Lindberg. 2006, 2007). After illumining the political "
By linking insights from Hadenius &. Teorell, Bueno de Mesquita, Geddes and many other prominent scholars who have contributed to political regime theory, the
Teorell and Hadenius (2009) prove that elections can promote democratisation, while Wahman (2013) notes that the alternation of an incumbent regime through
Welzel, ChristianInglehart, Ronald 2006 Emancipative Values and Democracy: Response to Hadenius and TeorellStudies in Comparative International
Axel Hadenius · Jan Teorell.
Jan Teorell Axel Hadenius = = = = = = = = = = = = QoG WORKING PAPER SERIES 2008:17 = = THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE regimes and monarchies (Hadenius and Teorell, !""(). However, if elections are neither merely an institutional legacy from a past regime nor a response to an intensiﬁed pressure for democratization but form part of an autocratic tool-box, they should not be randomly distributed across regime types. Rather, they The CCP is coded as a dominant or one-party civilian regime during its entire time in power by standard autocratic typologies such as Geddes (Reference Geddes 1999), Hadenius and Teorell (Reference Hadenius and Teorell 2007), and Cheibub et al. (Reference Cheibub, Gandhi and Vreeland 2010). Axel Hadenius Uppsala University (email@example.com) Jan Teorell Göteborg University (firstname.lastname@example.org) C&M The Committee on Concepts and Methods www.concepts-methods.org IPSA International Political Science Association www.ipsa.ca CIDE Teaching and Research in the Social Sciences www.cide.edu This article demonstrates that Axel Hadenius and Jan Teorell’s attempt to disprove a causal effect of emancipative mass orientations on democracy is flawed in each of its three lines of reasoning. Axel Hadenius and Jan Teorell Working Paper #331 - November 2006 Axel Hadenius is professor of political science at Lund University.
“Elections as Levers of Democracy: A Global Inquiry”, in Lindberg, S., ed. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009 (the conference paper version of this chapter won the APSA Comparative Democratization Section Award for the best paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meetings). Hadenius and Teorell, in a pioneering study of the democratization potential of various authoritarian regime types, compare the development of no-, one-, and multi-party autocracies to that of military and monarchic dictatorships. But they do
Teorell, Jan LU and Hadenius, Axel LU In Studies in Comparative International Development 41. p.95-111 Mark Working paper Working paper Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1972–2003
4 Hadenius and Teorell dependent for their position on the ruling leader. They lose everything when the leader falls.
Teorell (2010) frågar sig om demokrati kan mätas som en egenskap som det finns antingen mer eller mindre av av A Cornell · Citerat av 6 — forskningen men man kan samtidigt konstatera att det råder ganska stor enighet kring demokratins kärna (Hadenius 1992; Hadenius och Teorell 2005). Den här. av A Cornell — ganska stor enighet kring demokratins kärna, eller dess baskriterier (Hadenius 1992; Hadenius och. Teorell 2005).
This book attempts to answer these questions through a combination of a statistical analysis of social, economic, and international determinants of regime change in 165 countries around the world in 1972–2006, and case study work on nine
Skattehemvist i sverige
bolagsverket adress ändring
fotograf i kamerzysta na wesele
Curriculum Vitae - SILO of research documents
2010) are based on the nature of the ruling institution, the mode of succession and alternation, the way the leader accesses and exits office, and the allocation of power within the ruling elite. Among the most commonly identified subtypes are military dictatorships In developing their own typology of authoritarian regimes, Hadenius and Teorell critique Geddes, noting that she “omits some important types of nondemocratic regimes” (145) as they dispute the justification of “personalism” as an independent regime type; instead, they opt to conceptualize authoritarianism in the form of monarchies, military regimes, theocracies, transitional regimes 2013-01-29 2011-01-25 Hadenius A and Teorell J 2005 Learning more about democratization persistence from PSCI 1101 at Vanderbilt University 2013 (English) In: Contemporary Politics, ISSN 1356-9775, E-ISSN 1469-3631, Vol. 19, no 1, 19-34 p.